https://share.google/zkeoSxGtQVnGA40aI
Telegraph (London) article by Andrew Graham Dixon, art critic, journalist, (2000)
‘“The historical novel has always been a literary form at war with itself. The very term, implying a fiction somehow grounded in fact — a lie with obscure obligations to the truth — is suggestive of the contradictions of the genre”’ (R.Lee, 2000, quoting Dixon).
Lee, however, countered by reminding his audience that Dixon’s claim can just as easily be said of something contemporary’. He asked his audience
to think of Trainspotting (1996) or Bridget Jones’ Diary (1996). No one think of these two books are true: ‘Yet no-one would bother to read them if they didn’t believe that they were in some way drawn from life.’ Lee claims this may be a ‘contradiction’ but ‘it’s an absolute fundamental — perhaps the absolute fundamental quality of art. Not just fiction, but sculpture, painting, poetry ….all art’. For Lee, in this sense ‘all art is, to use Dixon’s words “at war itself”’. For Lee, ‘It [historical fiction] seeks, at the same time, both accuracy and illusion. It is ludicrous to say this is only a defining characteristic of historical fiction — it’s a defining characteristic of all fiction’